Part II. Should Initiative Blink?
In equability is that in equitability where of why some objective in conjunction to what but becomes not who so constructs converse counter recursive compromise historically resourced of course in humanity obverse over time. Of transgression, that widest in stride traversed from tyranny to travesties whereinunder handed over that in tone of broadband "devices to solecize divisively from elusion that some be of a simile fore-bearing through cogs" cast counter cognizance in sum slight at length to front for drive by cataclysmic shifts toward further advantage. Precedence in contention that demand dates correlate in pact collusive (eg. to pawn an IPO) predicted that the public will limit liability to a point of repute from that nature to orders of magnitude through some decimator that factions to fashion humanity in time ideometric to money. We strive to demonstrate otherwise.
As a blatant example to evidence action, in 2002 the author shared a nonprofit political analytics platform at ipoll.com. After being monitored by national and international think tanks for some time, the system was subject to a certain pattern of attack, the domain stolen, and records of ownership wiped. The author relaunched as ipoll.us, and subsequent to discussions with Political action Committees, decided to self fund the initiative through another venture. By 2004 the author invented the first mobile blogging platform of its kind for content syndication at mblog.com showcasing short status updates on the homepage and strategic direction on the about page, while demonstrating traction to the market. After being featured on CNN Money, albeit retracted from attribution to another company in association with Nokia, the system was subject to a certain pattern of attack, and the inventor pitched $25k for its purchase. The author categorically rejected the strong arm tactics and asseverated intellectual property ownership. Perhaps those responsible for national security in conjunction with the startup ecosystem together as financial community profiled the author, in an environment similar to that of a bout of white supremacist terrorism experienced seven years ago or that felt by the latino community today, in concern for dual use technologies that may be used to stimulate disruption within revolutionary economic cycles and found convenience in agency dynamics that would defer adjudgement of the author in relation to alleged potential for terroristic tendencies, and his inventions, concordantly.
Shortly thereafter a back of the envelope drawing at podcasting company Odeo would "mature" into a prototype that would garner a $6M+ investment to embark upon a hiring frenzy to "revamp" its purported brain-child Twitter (recall the $1M investment in a yet to be named search engine developed by a couple of Stanford grads, note that the author recalls that the early investments in Twitter were greater, and this should not cause aversity to archive.org assuming that it is not in cahoots with techcrunch). The timing of investments appears modified on the internet, which is both possible given the scope and scale of the fraud, and a dangerous power to afford through centralization. Meanwhile, the author, whose name is Tamer and whose initials are TSAR, as given on his birth certificate, would have to spend the next decade setting standards by hours for work ethic (115+) aversely converse to surveillance made possible by (their) presumption that he may be the beneficiary of his invention (which he should now be, see: The Twitter Files #3), macro-managed for artificial limitation through trajectories to frame and discredit him.
On Sept 11, 2011, associates of the would be Boston marathon bomber, Tamerlan TSARnev were murdered in cold blood, bludgeoned by a sword. Atypical to crimes of this nature, the case went cold. Two years later, growing more disturbed by social stimulus, and disgruntled by a temporary boxing federation ruling prohibiting his participation in competition, the perpetrators would place pressure cooker bombs at the marathon, both instrumental and guilty in the orchestration of attack upon (grounds of) the race set for 04-15-2013, seven months in difference to the Twitter IPO scheduled to be upon 11-07-2013. Note that, in fact, the months also add up to that day (11+/-4) that was stricken by grief, with a probability almost an order of magnitude less than 1%.
Was the probability of the author's name so correlated to the perpetrator's name conditioned to the event for favor to the author or to silence any aware in pact and mislead of that the public will counter the author stymied? In the decade that followed, no entities nationally or internationally have sought liability for the orchestration of these, or other events, or even acknowledged these correlations exist. Furthermore, no entity would have fathomed then that the author would remain in the limelight by production of the content of this blog or that the author would have evolved from being blacklisted to self imposed extremes of disassociation in order for matters to be construed in truth toward disfavor of its orchestrators.
Was the author complicit in the orchestration of these events by any standard of reason, did the orchestrators underestimate truth, perseverence and creativity, and did history naturally reflect that an inventor's rights ought to reflect economic relativity in freedom translated from origination in merit of invention? Conversely, in recognition of an opportunity for a hand off of/to amalgamated interests in order to resolve issues at large by amplitude of probability while maintaining the author financially captive, Twitter was sold to X, a company owned by a fellow who would later pose walking into the company carrying the sink. Despite the professionalism expected of agencies and the financial community in addition to public witness through goodwill the author sadly watched as forces advantaged by alignment misled and opportunities misrepresented decimated Twitter and rolled the community into Bluesky in further and mutual affront to (inventor) rights. Would diversity have people underestimate truth perseverence and creativity?
After a publishing hiatus, in a financial state representative of but not limited to duress to fold his position due to the toll the fraud was taking, conceivably of allowance to benefit the orchestrators, the author penned "Time Crystal Line" for information entropy to revive initiatives to restore standards that reject high crimes committed toward greater civilization backed by a sequence of just imagery illustrating the compromise of humanity. Without prior knowledge by the author, a series of events on the world stage would unfold averse to the author in question at the expense of human life and pointedly divisive in humanity, coinciding with image publication.
For example, on or around publication of the second editorial image, a political entity known as Hamas, engaged in what it purported to be legitimate resistance, in attack upon Israeli civilians, evidently through external strategic support while the IDF was atypically of delayed response, providing for the opportunity to maximize fallout. While the author was actively appalled, as a known supporter of the Palestinian cause, relative to their dilemma of rights long disregarded and their condition as a result of persecution, this event would create the false perception of association between the author's agenda and the actions of Hamas flagged. After watching in horror as focus must shift from standing up to one entity behind high crimes to another entity behind a high crime, as a function of currency, witnessing the agenda driven exploit targeting peoples, and the destruction of a people, the author once again took a hiatus from publishing until Independence day 2025, for time to reflect with respect to standards of civilization, upon empowerment by fraud, allowance by support therefore, and outcomes therefrom.
On July 4, 2025 the author's synopsis was met by a flooding in Kerr County, TX, presumably in retaliation for the firm ethic of people in the region relative to federal corruption as well as to distract from the narrative as if the right exists to exact from the author of research based predictions around Kerr black hole dynamics, of information surprisal to both the orchestrators and cohorts, made in "Ergo Sphere through Why", and later verified. Is that in question answerable through "Why" further that one wouldn't think time crystalline? Motive within expanse is not for the feint hearted.
Communication, akin fluence interferential through certainty/uncertainty tradeoffs inferential, in the reciprocity of entanglement over time. That in spectral exhibition empowers synchronization to synergize such that integral constructs capacitate truth to charge(?!) imposture behind the visors through material in structure. [Download supplementary data including links referenced herein]
Should our endeavor have been by that IPOwe'd or even Quid pro quo'd? Pick a number, any number. Bitcoin preferable, there was no gimmick. It was just I*.
A part of transmittance, apart of self interpolation subject to extrinsics, imparts of reflection relative to humanity for one self imports objective to object to that determination of yore for all of self-determination at the heart of reverberation. I hope you do too.