Should Initiative Blink

Monday July 14, 2025

In equability is that in equitability where of why some objective in conjunction to what but becomes not who so constructs converse counter recursive compromise historically resourced of course in humanity obverse over time. Precedence in content contention became the predicament for collusion to demand dates correlate by pact (eg. to pawn an IPO) predicative to finding that the public will limit liability between that from the nature to a point of repute relative to an order of magnitude as some decimating point that factions to fashion humanity in time ideometric to money. Of transgression that widest in stride traversed from tyranny to travesties whereinunder handed over that in tone of devices to solecize divisively from elusion that some be of a simile fore-bearing through cogs bandcast counter cognizance in sum slight at length to front for drive by cataclysmic shifts throughout asymmetric growth toward advantage. In what ways should we not have to demonstrate otherwise?

As a blatant example to evidence action, in 2002 the author shared a nonprofit political analytics platform at ipoll.com. After being monitored by national and international think tanks for some time, the system was subject to a certain pattern of attack, the domain stolen, and records of ownership wiped. The author relaunched as ipoll. us, and subsequent to discussions with political action committees, decided to self fund the initiative through another venture. By 2004 the author invented the first mobile blogging platform of its kind in content syndication at mblog.com showcasing short status updates on the homepage and strategic direction on the about page, while demonstrating traction to the market. After being featured on CNN Money, albeit retracted from attribution to another company in association with Nokia, the system was subject to a certain pattern of attack, and the inventor pitched $25k for its purchase. The author categorically rejected the strong arm tactic and asseverated intellectual property ownership.

Perhaps those responsible for national security in conjunction with the startup ecosystem, together as financial community, profiled the author within an environment similar to a bout of white supremacist terror experienced seven years ago, or that felt by the latino community today, throughout concern for dual use technologies that may stimulate disruption in revolutionary economic cycles and toward convenience in agency dynamics, finding to defer adjudgement of alleged potential for terroristic tendencies and merit from invention, concordantly.

Shortly thereafter a back of the envelope drawing at podcasting company Odeo would mature into a prototype that would garner a $6M investment to embark upon a hiring frenzy to "revamp" its purported brain-child Twitter (recall the $1M investment in a yet to be named search engine developed by a couple of Stanford grads, noting that the author recalls early investments in Twitter were greater, and this is not averse to archive.org assuming that it does not nonfactually reappear relative to the indexing of this post). That such information could be modified through control of data via the internet, given the scope and scale of the fraud, is a dangerous power to afford to centralization. Meanwhile, the author, whose name is Tamer and whose initials are TSAR, would spend the next decade setting standards by hours for work ethic (115+), aversely converse to the surveillance made possible by any presumed beneficiary due to differentiation through such invention which should now be relative to The Twitter Files #3, yet macro-managed for limitation through artifice to frame and discredit.

On Sept 11, 2011, during media buzz about impending public advertisement of a Twitter IPO, and after the author was taken by surprise in Egypt only to survive the January 25th revolution that followed his birthday, associates of the would be Boston marathon bomber, Tamerlan TSARnev, were murdered in cold blood, bludgeoned by a sword. Atypical to crimes of this nature, the case went cold. Two years later, growing more disturbed by social stimulus, and disgruntled by a temporary boxing federation ruling prohibiting his participation in competition, the perpetrators would place pressure cooker bombs at the marathon, both instrumental and guilty in the orchestration of attack upon (grounds of) the race set for 04-15-2013, seven months in difference to the Twitter IPO scheduled to be upon 11-07-2013. Note that, in fact, the months also add up (sub down) to that day that was stricken by grief, as an order of magnitude less than 1% begins to inadvertently amplify the improbability, unaware of this blog. Was the infinitesimal probability of the author's name so correlated to the perpetrator's name conditioned to the < 1% event for favor to the author or ahead of the IPO in pact to silence any aware and mislead of the public will counter the author thus stymied?

In the decade that followed no entities nationally or internationally have sought liability for the orchestration of these, or related events, or have acknowledged these correlations even exist. Furthermore, none would have fathomed then that the author would remain in the limelight by production in content of this blog or that the author would have evolved from being blacklisted to self imposed extremes of disassociation in order for matters to be construed in truth toward disfavor of its orchestrators. Could the author be complicit in the orchestration of these events by any standard of reason, did its orchestrators underestimate truth of due time, perseverence and creativity, and did history naturally reflect that rights from origination in merit of invention translate to such requisite of freedom in economic relativity through scales of equitability that hold parallel(s) in tending to empower meant of natural constructs that must fare well [to] any absolute(s) for mutual [in] capacitation of freedom with[in] diversity [to]wards greater growth?

Conversely, in recognition of an opportunity for a hand off of/to amalgamated interests in order to resolve issues at large by amplitude of probability further, though while maintaining the author financially captive, Twitter was sold to X, a company owned by a fellow who would later move per poise walking out of the company carrying the sink. Despite the professionalism expected from agencies to the financial community in addition to the public witness of goodwill the author sadly watched as forces advantaged by alignment misled and misrepresented the opportunity in order to decimate Twitter and roll the community into Bluesky in further mutual affront.

After a publishing hiatus, in a financial state representative of but not limited to duress to fold this position due to the toll the fraud was taking, conceivably of allowance to benefit the orchestrators, the author penned "Time Crystal Line" for information entropy to revive initiatives to restore standards that may reject the high crimes committed toward greater civilization, backed by a sequence of just imagery illustrating the current state of humanity in compromise. A series of events on the world stage would then unfold, coincident to publication yet without prior knowledge by the author in question of adversity, not-withstanding such averse of expense to human life, pointedly divisive in humanity. For example, on or around publication of the second editorial image, a political entity known as Hamas, engaging in what it purported to be legitimate resistance, attacked Israeli civilians, evidently through external strategic support while the IDF was atypically of delayed response, providing for the opportunity to maximize fallout.

The author, a known supporter of the Palestinian cause relative to their dilemma of rights disregarded and their condition of long term persecution, while actively appalled, would become concerned that event synchronicity was akin to counter-politico-incidence "catalyzed". Multi-tasked as such from some objective to imagery responsive, what operative(s) to timing flags trespass of history wherefor given the fraud would purport to ^import some interest for perpetuity from that national implying such manufacture by that notional. Those notions driven of artifice through failure to resolve a right capitalized upon throughout absolution with-in fractions deriven as such would have drive from measure over-due wherein determinants fore do measure cumulative to democracy toward detriment. Yet such would continue to have decoherence pattern from impositional socio-economic constructs throughout agress upon author private rights. Such further would have, though through scaler thought, nations scaled by notions whereof what from foundational values should hold to-ward that be held (to) scale amiss representative value; and with such foundational values held to scale, would nations of dignity be holding misrepresented value of scale.

Such would be telescopic to widespread iniquity within directives to incapacitate allegoric value for root cause resolution in appropriation of authority (and though slightly less authoritative, one remains about the same size) through that manufacture, and to the author's concern, falsely stimulating perception of association between the author's agenda and the actions of Hamas. While watching in horror as focus would, somewhat driven by a function of currency, favor, and errancy, shift from humanity standing up to one entity behind high crimes to another entity behind a high crime; sometime during the agenda driven exploit targeting peoples, and the destruction of a people, the author once again took a hiatus from publishing until Independence day 2025, for time to reflect with respect to standards of civilization, upon empowerment by fraud, allowance by support therefore, and outcomes therefrom.

On July 4, 2025 the author's synopsis was met by a flooding in Kerr County, TX, presumably in retaliation for the firm ethic of people in the region relative to federal corruption as well as to distract from the narrative, as if a right existed to exact from the author of research based predictions around Kerr black hole dynamics, of information surprisal to both the orchestrators and cohorts, in "Ergo Sphere through Why", and later verified. Was that in question answerable through "Why" further, that one wouldn't think time crystalline? Motive by expanse is not for the feint hearted.

On July 28, 2025 the recurring pattern of correlation abbreviated herein occurred in form of an unstable Tamaru by a NYC shooting for slight of arguments concomitant to the drafting of this post. It is the author's understanding that orchestrators of such events, of a belief in growth in acceptance of its conduct, are rudimentarily asserting dominance over society, empowered by bleeding edge technology, while engaging in a psychological ploy through utility of association in-decision, gaming the theory that if, with the exception of what became Twitter, any adjudge pro author relative to an externally sourced event orchestrated to associate the author, then they have adjudged for the author due to the event, so they should not adjudge in favor of the author, until, if ever correctly adjudged, they have maximized the probability of framing the author by association, so advantaged. Similarly, stewarded false flag operations, whether truly stewarded or otherwise, exploit a false sense of complicity by association for the victim in loss to defer guilt to a steward of initial assignment, such that they may become complacent to the source of attack, as passengers toward self-denial of justice, whereas the only port of complicity is knowingly profiteering from the aforementioned psychological ploy, which the author cannot be held complicit to by merit of invention and ability to deny the orchestrators, which has substantively harmed him through constraints of/in great grief and hardship. These travesties do not continue unchecked by the magnitude of people who unwaveringly stand intolerant of both the history in action and any such future action, including that to neutralize the author bound to string of (their) high tales.

Communication, akin fluence interferential through certainty/uncertainty tradeoffs inferential, in the reciprocity of entanglement over time. That in spectral exhibition empowers synchronization to synergize through integral constructs that capacitate truth to charge imposture behind bad visors through relativity of material in structure.

[Download supplementary data including links referenced herein]